One of the largest difficulties with research that’s designed and packaged for the customer or the public is that the information contained within is normally manipulated in such a way that it is not entirely truthful. This counter arguments and can be incredibly debatable especially when the research provides a number of reasons why something should or should not be done and leaves out the other rationales.
We all know there are numerous cases where lobbying companies which are actually law firms in Washington DC, but many of them additionally run research that is political think tanks. Obviously, the work that they do is carried out to convince citizens, voters, politicians, and policymakers for their point of view. Most of the time it is skewed towards their edge, although occasionally their point of view is right on the money.
This surely should not shock anybody; it is how things are done. Regrettably, it’s also bathed in trickery, falsehood, and deceit.
So, how could you inform the difference between high quality and powerful public policy research exploitation? The thing that is interesting is that you can’t always tell. Sometimes these groups are so good, camouflaged that they look entirely valid.